<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Wave Links (weekly)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/</link>
	<description>For a Clearer Understanding of Google Wave and its Application</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:15:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree with Brett.  I think maybe the functionality of Google Wave is currently too heavily reliant on Bots and Gadgets which operate on occasion and with lots of bugs.  Perhaps the preview release is a little on the premature side: some of the functions are still a bit unintuitive.  Also, it&#039;s surprising to see that the &quot;Wavers&quot; (as it seems the developers have called themselves) did not already integrate other Google products (Docs seems like a natural inclusion) in an intrinsic way, seeing as many of the current Preview users are already happy Google/Gmail customers (like me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;d have to agree with Brett.  I think maybe the functionality of Google Wave is currently too heavily reliant on Bots and Gadgets which operate on occasion and with lots of bugs.  Perhaps the preview release is a little on the premature side: some of the functions are still a bit unintuitive.  Also, it&#8217;s surprising to see that the &#8220;Wavers&#8221; (as it seems the developers have called themselves) did not already integrate other Google products (Docs seems like a natural inclusion) in an intrinsic way, seeing as many of the current Preview users are already happy Google/Gmail customers (like me).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by TheGoogle_Wave</title>
		<link>http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by TheGoogle_Wave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by TheGoogle_Wave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] This post was Twitted by TheGoogle_Wave [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfinggooglewave.com/2009/12/the-google-wave-links-weekly-3/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll be interesting to see if this person&#039;s view of Wave remains a year from now. It&#039;s true that Wave is in preview and not fully released with a ton of kinks to sort out. While I agree with some of his points, I also realize that Wave is quite different than anything we&#039;ve experienced before, so I&#039;d like to give it time to understand and give Google the opportunity to offer a really great addition to the way we communicate. But we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if this person&#8217;s view of Wave remains a year from now. It&#8217;s true that Wave is in preview and not fully released with a ton of kinks to sort out. While I agree with some of his points, I also realize that Wave is quite different than anything we&#8217;ve experienced before, so I&#8217;d like to give it time to understand and give Google the opportunity to offer a really great addition to the way we communicate. But we&#8217;ll see.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->